UiPath Licenses ( Studio vs Non Production)

[sahilwadhwa100]

With a non production license i can use studio , deploy any package . In a nutshell we can use all functionalities of Studio license

Warning is displayed but it never restricts me to use studio and develop code

[Anthony_Humphries]

This just means that Studio is tied to a robot license labeled “Non-production”. This makes sense if you’re using a machine only for development purposes. If you need Studio to be associated with a production robot, you’ll need to associate an Unattended or Attended bot to the machine.

[sahilwadhwa100]

In that sense for a development environment non production license is similar to studio license for a machine

[codemonkee (Tim)]

Production and NonProduction are Unattended Type Robots where Studio/StudioX and Attended are Attended Type Robots.

The message is displayed as Unattended type Robot is not intended to licenses your Studio originally, but could be used for troubleshooting/debugging a package you might have deployed. I believe the stance on this has changed slightly when it comes to the Community Edition when Studio Pro was introduced.

@Forum_Staff can you confirm / clarify?

[loginerror (Maciej Kuźmicz)]

It is actually quite straight-forward:

This basically means that using Studio under these licenses is only allowed for troubleshooting:

• in the case of unattended license, it is a breach of licensing terms if you use this license for actual development (and not just checking what goes wrong on your Robot machine)
• in the case of non-production license (which is, well, called non-production for a reason ), it is the same; this license type exists to help out with migrations to new UiPath versions by providing a way to run your robots on a parallel environment and debug any issues;

You cannot use these licenses for actual development without breaching the licensing terms.