So what I got right now from my robot is “Output Written to Data Table” where the customer name and ID are repetitively but the amount is correct.
I want the output as expected below… Where the value 5 million, 4 and half million is written to each column. (Jan 5 Million, Feb 4 and half million, etc)
What if the customer name is duplicate? if I transpose Customer name John Doe, wouldn’t it still be repetitively written or it will written only once as I expected?
What should I fill in the add data column? Is it the variable of the value?
Soo, I just found something that I just figured out now. The Column “Total 2” is ignored , and Transpose is working for headers, but there’s 1 problem that the month I want (as expected) is actually not a header… It’s a value, so it’s gonna be like this
Unfortunately no, it can’t be a static template… If the robot is running on Jun, then first value of the column month will be Jun, If it’s running on March, then first value will be march, etc
Is the Customer Name and Customer ID, going to be a single value always ? Meaning it’s going to be one value that is going to be repeated for Different Values and Month or Can we expect multiple customers being present in it as well ?
I got a question, based on the workflow you give… You are connecting the headers and the value right? Is it do able to tranpose without the header?
Because my robot is set static of Month-1 based on when the robot runs
(Example : if robot running on July, then starting month will be June, if the robot running on November, starting month will be October). I just need to transpose the Column value only
The requirement is changing. So I just need to output the value based on month-1 and so on. So the value at the early will not be null, it will always have value. This can be done with getdate() in SQL query.
So by using month and value dictionary, it will written columns? Can I use this community package instead? Because when I tried using it, my value is transposed but it’s written in 1 single column.
To be honest I haven’t tried so I don’t have any arguments for it… I’m just thinking if we can use a community package provided instead of making manual workflow, wasn’t it more better and more efficient?
We have more control on the parts where we need to modify the code/activity when we do it using simple activities. As you have mentioned, if a ready package is used, the transposed datatable may not be the exact output that you would require, we would require to alter it again later by adding few more steps to the flow.
To avoid that part, we can build the same logic from the source/start.