In what way is the new API trigger feature better than say using queue triggers? What does it inherently mean to create a GET trigger or POST trigger? I am finding it hard to see use cases other than just starting a process with the URI provided from the trigger.
API triggers are useful in scenarios where external systems or custom applications need to initiate the execution of UiPath processes. They provide a way to integrate UiPath automation into larger workflows or systems.
Queue triggers are particularly useful in scenarios where processes need to be triggered based on specific events or data changes. For example, a process might be triggered whenever a new order is added to a sales queue.
API triggers are initiated through external HTTP requests and allow passing parameters to the process explicitly. On the other hand, Queue triggers are based on the presence of items in a queue, and the associated data with the queue item is automatically passed to the process when triggered. The choice between API triggers and Queue triggers depends on the specific requirements of your automation workflow and how you want to integrate with external systems or handle data passing.
Hope it helps!!
@kristjankarl
Happy Automation
Regards
This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.