To understand risk factors while using UiPath remote runtime extension on RDP machine

Help Forum
,
1

Hello, I’m seeking assistance in drafting a risk document for implementing a remote runtime extension. Specifically, I’m interested in identifying the potential risk factors associated with installing the remote runtime extension on a remote server. I’m utilizing the community edition to experiment with accessing remote machine services using Robot, but I need to compile a list of potential risk parameters to share with customers.

Need document which can showcase with customer for approval

2

UiPath Remote Runtime Extension Risk Assessment Document

1. Introduction

This document aims to identify and assess the risks associated with the installation and use of UiPath’s Remote Runtime extension on a remote server within an RDP environment. The Remote Runtime extension facilitates the automation of virtual desktop interfaces by the UiPath Robot.

2. Scope

The scope of this risk assessment covers the installation and operational use of the UiPath Remote Runtime extension on a Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) machine used for automation purposes.

3. Risk Identification

3.1. Security Risks

  • Unauthorized Access Risk: If not properly secured, the Remote Runtime could be accessed by unauthorized users, leading to potential data breaches or unauthorized actions.
  • Data Interception Risk: Data transmitted between the Robot and the Remote Runtime extension could be intercepted if encryption is not enforced.

3.2. Compliance Risks

  • Data Protection Compliance: Installation of the Remote Runtime may affect compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, or other data protection regulations if sensitive data is processed and not handled according to the guidelines.

3.3. Operational Risks

  • Dependency on Network Stability: The Remote Runtime’s performance is highly dependent on network reliability and bandwidth, which could impact automation stability.
  • Compatibility Issues: Potential incompatibility with other software or updates on the remote server might cause disruptions.

3.4. Performance Risks

  • Resource Utilization: The Remote Runtime extension may consume significant system resources, potentially impacting the performance of other applications.

4. Risk Analysis and Impact

  • For each identified risk, evaluate the likelihood of occurrence and the potential impact on operations, data security, and compliance.

5. Mitigation Strategies

  • Implement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms.
  • Use encryption for data in transit between the Robot and the Remote Runtime.
  • Ensure compliance with relevant data protection laws by applying appropriate controls.
  • Monitor network performance and have contingency plans for network outages.
  • Perform compatibility testing with other software and after updates.
  • Monitor the resource utilization of the Remote Runtime and adjust system resources accordingly.

6. Residual Risks

  • Describe the risks that remain after mitigation strategies have been applied and how they will be managed.

7. Review and Approval

  • The document should be reviewed by relevant stakeholders and formally approved.

8. Revision History

  • Document the changes made to the risk assessment over time.

Appendix A: Definitions

  • Include definitions of technical terms used within the document.

Appendix B: Contact Information

  • Provide contact details for the individuals responsible for the risk assessment and mitigation strategies.

Note: based on your company policies some changes need