Help related to choose right UI path License for my use case

Feedback Robot
,
1

Dear Team,

I need help to understand about the UI path licence which I need for my following use case

Use Case:

I need to run multiple orchestrator processes on the same machine or robot as unattended. At this point, since I have community edition, so I am able to run only in only 1 unattended robot. Please let me know which licence option is the best suitable for my use case.

Thanks in advance

3

@hvishwaradhya

If you need only for running as it is only one machine and one robot…you need one unattended license

If you need to develop aa well then one more developer license

Cheers

4

@Anil_G thanks for the reply,

I need to have parallel jobs or process to run on same robot or same docker image with multiple containers , Can you please let me know which license is right for this use case

5

@hvishwaradhya

Same robot cannot run parallel…because each robot needs one license and can tun only one process…assuming it is foreground…

If they are background processes then multiple can run and you need those many licenses as how many you need in parallel

Cheers

6

@Anil_G I am fine to run in background all my process and so can I run in same docker image with multiple containers in parallel ?

7

@hvishwaradhya

yes you can

if the process is background

cheers

1 Like
8

Thank you @Anil_G for your quick response, I really appreciate it

1 Like
9

I’d urge you to read your community terms and conditions. You can only use it for learning and non-commerical reasons. So if you are trying to run unattended for a commercial purpose you need to buy a licence, which it sounds like you might be doing since you want to run multiple unattended robots.

10

@Jon_Smith Thanks Jon for clarification, but I do not understand in which part I am violating the terms and conditions, I just wanted to understand the capabilities of UI path licence so that I can better judge for my use case. If you still think this is violating the terms, then I am sorry, I will more cautious next time on such topics. Have a nice day

11

To be clear, I was not explicitly saying you are violating the terms as its not clear, but I see a risk of it hence me urging you to double check.
There are a large number of people who do use it commercially, against the TOS and so its not uncommon, if you are fully aware and using it for learning / non commerical than all is good buddy :slight_smile:

1 Like
12

This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.