Definitively:
is not the shared syntax
we are using [ ]
for surrounding the column names, the IN syntax for reducing redundancies
Maybe you will carefully reread the given help
BTW:
- the case looks like it has a different AIM
- The used approach risks to be a XY Problem
- we prefer a more straightforward handling also to avoid heavy ping-pongs and get things done fast
Maybe you can shortcut this all by:
- sharing a minified input sample representing the nature of input data
- The expected output sample(s)
Thanks for support