I did it still the issue persists
what if i want to invoke that orchestrator workflow with create form task and wait resume in a process work flow .Im getting issue in that scenario
I think these two are still valid:
This means that you cannot use the Persistence activities from within an invoked workflow.
Could you show a screenshot of what you are trying to achieve if that’s not the case?
yes sure
1.This the orchestrator process where I have created a" create from task" and resume activity
2.This is simple process where I am invoking that orchestrator process
But I am getting error
Hi @Srishti_saxena
Can you update the package
Thanks
Ashwin S
I think you cannot use the Wait for Form Task and Resume activity in an invoked workflow. These persistence activities only work from the Main.xaml (or any workflow in you project that is marked as the main one).
I ran into the same issue. Well I think this is kind of nonsense that the Wait for Form Task and Resume
needs to be in the Mail.xaml
file.
If someone is using the ReFramework like we do, this is kind of impossible as the Process is in an extracted Process.xaml
file.
So how to solve this now? Is there another way to resume? And if not, what is the sense of resuming something that may not be in an invoke.
did you found a solution for this?
Yes, I extended the ReFramework. But the changes were huge!
Basically the idea was that I throw a custom exception in the process workflow. This exception contains the TaskObject as data parameter. And do not forget to serialize the object.
And then back in the main workflow I catch the custom exception and and deserialize it back. And now I have the TaskObject in the main workflow and can use it.
But I worked like a whole week on the implementation.
Sadly that this does not come directly from UiPath. Hope you got the idea.
hi all
here is the fix for that error
it work to change to the following setting in the project.json file?
“supportsPersistence”: true
Solved the problem in two steps
1: First of all go to the project settings.
2: Then enable the Supports Persistence.
Great
Is there a reason for this? This just wasted 2 weeks of project time. So there’s no way to adjust the project settings? Or anything else to get it working?
EDIT: Tried looking at Project Setting, Persistence is set to on. Frankly this is a bug.
Hello @AlexanderERoss ,
I recorded these screen shots a while ago in a document. Therefore I must have run into these issues in the past. Can you see if these help? I’m shooting in the dark here, but one never knows.
Name of output object is set differently from the input:
Hi @RanaMuhammadAli,
My team used this settings and UiPath prerequisites but I have the same issue that @kwoxer.
I just find a new Reframework Template, but that means that we need to rework all the process to adapt it.
So if one of you have an idea before to help us, I will be grateful to him.
Thanks.
Were you able to get a solution/fix for this issue?
Hi @kwoxer,
I am having the same issue .My create form and Task and Resume is in the Process workflow. How to make changes to run in Main workflow.
I am getting error “System exception. Max number of retries reached. An extension of type ‘UiPath.Activities.Contracts.Persistence.IPersistenceBookmarks’ must be configured in order to run this workflow. at Source: System.Activities”
I have renamed my main workflow as UC004_CreditRollover. Can you help on this
similar issue facing here…need assitance…without wait for resume it is working fine…But with wait for resume the invoked workflow is fialing…I have used both of them inside invoke workflow
Sorry for response after two years but I think it may be valuable for other people who still get the same issue.
I came across the same limitation and I just split Process.xaml
into two parts: Process.xaml
and Process2.xaml
- then put Form activities and Wait for Form Task and Resume
. This way you can execute whatever’s in Process2.xaml
according to output from form response.
I’m not sure what your approach with exceptions achieves, definitely requires more steps to make it work. What was specific requirement that made you choose this approach?